Choosing the Right LMS Isn’t Just a Technical Decision — It’s a Strategic One

By Josh Yavelberg, PhD

Lessons from the Front Lines of Learning Management System Support

At Flying Cloud Solutions, we’ve helped organizations implement and optimize their learning management systems — from associations and nonprofits to universities and coalitions. Our LMS support has spanned clients like the New Mexico Association of School Business Officials, the Government Alliance on Race and Equity, the National Recreation and Park Association, Tuskegee University, and the Canada Humane Society.

Each of these clients came to us at a similar moment: they had just invested in a new LMS and needed help turning it into a usable, sustainable platform that met their organizational goals.

What they often discovered — and what we’ve learned time and again — is that choosing the right LMS isn’t just about functionality; it’s about fit.


⚠️ The Fit Problem: When Platforms Fail the Mission

Learning Management Systems can be a huge step forward for any organization — offering centralized training, scalable delivery, credentialing, analytics, and more. But here’s the problem: many organizations invest in an LMS before fully understanding their needs, audience workflows, accessibility requirements, or content strategy.

The result?

  • The system doesn’t support non-traditional learning formats.
  • The content structure doesn’t align with how the audience engages.
  • Essential features (like cohort-based enrollment, analytics, or language support) are only available in higher pricing tiers or not at all.
  • The interface frustrates learners and drains staff time.
  • The true cost of implementation isn’t clear until you’re already committed.

The system doesn’t support non-traditional learning formats.
Many of the organizations we support serve diverse learners — adult professionals, multilingual communities, field-based practitioners, or credential-seeking students who learn asynchronously and on the move. Yet many LMS platforms are designed for linear, academic-style learning: click-through modules, rigid assessments, and time-boxed enrollments. When the system lacks flexibility to support community-driven discussion, hybrid learning events, informal resource hubs, or portfolio-based reflection, it forces teams to either abandon these formats or invent clunky workarounds. One association we supported wanted to integrate live events, peer mentoring, a workbook, and badge pathways — but their LMS couldn’t handle anything beyond static content modules. We had to build a blended solution using external tools and embed them back into the LMS to simulate the experience they needed. The lack of support for these innovative formats can stifle creativity and reduce the impact of well-designed programming.

The content structure doesn’t align with how the audience engages.
Too often, the LMS assumes learners will engage with content in a rigid, predefined order — but real-world learners rarely behave that way. Some want to jump directly into the resources they need, others seek exploration and discovery, and many need learning delivered in bite-sized, mobile-friendly formats. When the LMS imposes a structure that’s too linear or too complex to navigate intuitively, the learner experience suffers. In one case, an organization serving frontline workers needed quick access to “just-in-time” microlearning videos. Their LMS forced learners to enroll in full courses just to access one short clip — creating unnecessary friction and reducing completion rates. The right structure should meet the learner where they are, not make them adapt to the platform’s limitations. When that alignment is missing, engagement drops, and the LMS becomes a barrier instead of a gateway.

Essential features (like cohort-based enrollment, analytics, or language support) are only available in higher pricing tiers or not at all.
One of the most frustrating challenges organizations face is discovering that the features they assumed were standard — like being able to group learners into cohorts, analyze completion data, or provide content in multiple languages — are either locked behind premium paywalls or not available at all. For mission-driven organizations with tight budgets, this often means making difficult trade-offs between access and functionality. We’ve seen clients sign contracts only to later realize they couldn’t segment learners by region or program, making progress tracking nearly impossible. Others discovered their LMS couldn’t deliver automated certificates or track micro-credentials without expensive add-ons. Language accessibility is a particularly acute issue for global or multilingual audiences — several platforms promise multilingual support, but only deliver partial localization or require a complete re-entry of content. These gaps aren’t just inconveniences — they can directly undermine equity, compliance, and strategic goals.

The interface frustrates learners and drains staff time.
While backend functionality is crucial, the user experience — both for learners and administrators — often determines long-term success. Unfortunately, many LMS platforms prioritize enterprise features over intuitive design. Learners are met with clunky dashboards, hidden navigation, unclear progress indicators, or overwhelming interfaces that feel more like filing systems than learning environments. On the staff side, simple updates often require multi-step processes, redundant data entry, or unintuitive workflows that drain time and morale. We’ve worked with teams who had to manually re-upload and relink every video for each new cohort, or who spent hours adjusting permissions across nested folders because the LMS lacked role-based automation. The burden on administrators reduces their capacity to focus on content and learner support — and when learners get lost or frustrated, support requests increase, and momentum stalls. Ultimately, a poor interface erodes the trust and enthusiasm that make learning stick.

The true cost of implementation isn’t clear until you’re already committed.
One of the most common pitfalls in LMS adoption isn’t hidden fees from providers — it’s the unanticipated costs that arise from decisions made without a full understanding of usage-based pricing models. In one case, an association we supported offered a set of SCORM-based certification preparation modules as part of a free marketing campaign. While the strategy was successful in attracting over 2,500 registrants, each SCORM package incurred a $0.50 to $1.00 per-user tracking fee through their LMS. With five SCORM modules included, the platform quickly generated a substantial monthly cost that hadn’t been considered during budgeting. The LMS provider had disclosed these costs, but the association hadn’t fully calculated the downstream financial impact of offering high-volume access at scale. Though they were able to absorb the expense once it became apparent, the initial surprise created unnecessary stress and forced rapid budget adjustments. This example underscores the importance of scenario planning and cost modeling — particularly when using SCORM, AI-driven features, or campaigns designed to scale. At Flying Cloud Solutions, we work with our clients to think several moves ahead so great ideas don’t get derailed by unforeseen costs.

In short, the LMS becomes a limiting system, not a learning one.

For several of our clients, this misalignment meant building workarounds almost immediately after go-live — leading to added costs, time loss, and reduced trust in the system.


🛠 How We Respond: Strategy + Creative Solutions

Flying Cloud Solutions doesn’t just help you turn the lights on in your LMS — we rebuild the electrical grid when needed.

Across the clients we’ve served, we’ve developed implementation plans that go beyond the default capabilities of the LMS by:

  • Integrating free or low-cost external tools like Google Drive, Google Sites, or embedded Forms to extend the functionality of limited platforms
  • Incorporating video hosting platforms such as Vimeo, YouTube (unlisted or private), or cloud-hosted MP4s to overcome file size or streaming limitations
  • Building course structures and SOPs that translate your goals into platform-ready workflows
  • Creating branded user experiences within rigid LMS interfaces using design overlays, consistent navigation, and learner guidance
  • Acting as a liaison between the client and the LMS vendor, often advocating for product adaptation, accessibility improvements, or custom integrations
  • Supporting staff with training, documentation, and internal SOPs to ensure sustainable success beyond launch

In some cases, we’ve essentially created an ecosystem around the LMS — one that supports the actual needs of the learners, staff, and stakeholders even when the platform itself falls short. While we can put bubblegum in the cracks, we encourage organizations to engage prior to making an LMS decision. In terms or ROI, it is more cost effective to get the right solution than to polish an incorrect fit.


🔮 What’s Next: AI in the LMS Ecosystem

The LMS landscape is entering a new era — one shaped by the growing promise and complexity of artificial intelligence. Across the board, platforms are racing to introduce AI-driven features aimed at improving personalization, efficiency, and learner outcomes. While these developments offer exciting potential, they also introduce new challenges for organizations who must determine what’s useful, what’s hype, and what’s right for their learners.

Some LMS platforms are beginning to integrate:

  • AI-generated quizzes and auto-tagging of content to reduce instructional design workload
  • Predictive analytics that recommend learning paths or flag at-risk users based on engagement patterns
  • Chatbots and virtual tutors designed to answer learner questions or provide coaching on demand
  • Natural language processing for improved accessibility, translation, and feedback collection
  • Behavior-based personalization, dynamically adapting learning content to user preferences or performance

But as with everything in the LMS world, not all AI is created equal. Some features are mature and reliable; others are in beta, clunky, or overly generalized. Some platforms charge extra for AI tools, others offer them as loss leaders. Even more importantly, not every organization is ready — either culturally, ethically, or operationally — to activate AI at scale.

And that’s where Flying Cloud Solutions comes in.


🧠 How We Help Organizations Navigate the AI Shift

We don’t just keep up — we scout ahead. Our team maintains a research database of nearly 100 LMS platforms, attending conferences, testing beta features, reviewing vendor roadmaps, and building direct relationships with product teams. This gives us a practical understanding of how AI is evolving in real time — and where the implementation risks and opportunities truly lie.

Through our Be AI-gile™ framework, we help organizations assess not only what AI can do, but whether it should be used, how it aligns with the mission, and how to roll it out responsibly. We guide clients through:

  • AI readiness assessments, identifying gaps in data governance, digital literacy, and content strategy
  • AI use case mapping, helping teams prioritize real needs over shiny features
  • Ethical AI considerations, especially around privacy, accessibility, and human oversight
  • Tool selection and integration strategy, ensuring AI fits the ecosystem, not just the vendor pitch
  • Training and change management, supporting staff as they adapt to new workflows and decision-making models

In short, we help teams adopt AI with intention — not overwhelm.

Whether you’re just beginning to explore AI capabilities or facing pressure to activate new LMS features you’re not sure how to manage, Flying Cloud Solutions offers the clarity, context, and support you need to navigate this landscape confidently.


✅ Bottom Line: The Right LMS Is the One That Fits You

Every LMS migration or implementation is more than just a software rollout — it’s an opportunity to align learning delivery with your organization’s mission, audience, and long-term goals. But when the technology doesn’t fit, momentum stalls. Teams get frustrated. Learners disengage. Costs climb.

With the right guidance, however, a well-implemented LMS becomes more than a tool — it becomes a strategic asset. It’s the sail that catches the wind, not the anchor that drags behind.

At Flying Cloud Solutions, we don’t just plug in platforms. We bring the frameworks, experience, and creativity to ensure your LMS supports your learners, your content, and your future. Whether you’re choosing a platform, migrating content, or realizing midstream that your current system isn’t working — we’re here to help you navigate with clarity, not confusion.


🚀 Ready to Rethink Your LMS Strategy?

Whether you’ve just bought a system or are realizing it may not meet your needs, let’s talk. We support your LMS journey from guiding searches, migration, and continued services to maintain and grow your online learning services at pace.

📞 Book a discovery call to explore how we can help you implement, optimize, or even pivot your LMS strategy — with clarity and confidence.